4. Set Realistic Expectations
The level of commitment you can expect depends on many factors. Not all stakeholders will be able to have the same level of buy-in, so it’s important to set realistic expectations.
“People participate on different levels,” Schuttauf said. “It’s helpful, in a corporate or association setting, to understand that [participation varies] based on their age or stage of life, or what time they have available.”
It’s necessary to set realistic expectations when making an ask of internal teammates. “When you’re talking to potential partners, it’s really important to recognize the investment you’re asking on their part,” Strieter-Elting said. “Everybody already has a full plate, so make sure these projects are mutually beneficial.” She recommends considering the following before requesting something from someone in your organization:
- What can I do that only requires a resource from another department, but no work on their part?
- What can I do that requires a little assistance from another department but will make them look good?
- What can I do that requires a true partnership with another department and will be a major project?
5. Provide Examples to Set the Precedent
Use internal or industry examples of when collaboration across departments can have a major impact. If you have internal examples from the past when government affairs buy-in was successful, bring them up, said Joshua Habursky, head of government affairs for the Premium Cigar Association, in a FiscalNote webinar.
“Schedule a meeting with your co-workers and say, we’ve done this three years ago, our departments worked together, this is why it was successful and this is what everyone brought to the table,” Habursky suggested. If you don’t have internal examples, use examples and anecdotes from organizations in your industry that are getting it right. Consider this one:
How PCMA Manages Multiple Team Members & Objectives
Leveraging the work his team members do, Randy Kane, senior manager of state affairs at the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA), can assess the implications of critical pieces of policies, identify trends, and inform forward-looking strategy. His team has many different needs — from policy analysts to lobbyists to managers — so alignment between teams is critical to keep things running smoothly.
“Say on any given month, we've seen the most introduced bills on this issue, but we've actually written the most common letters on bills related to this other issue,” Kane says. “I'll report these findings to our policy shop. From there, we'll work on whether or not we need to produce new advocacy materials, comment letters, things like that.”
With folks responsible for multiple states and high volumes of complex bills, having access to a single repository — keeping a record of all the moving pieces associated with their work — is necessary to drive alignment and increase efficiencies across team members. From policy developments to activity metrics, teams need an easy and reliable place to get the information they’re looking for. “If there is a new person that joins the team, they can get that historical perspective from the [FiscalNote] platform,” said Melodie Shrader, vice president of state affairs at PCMA who manages a nimble team of lobbyists.
Having a centralized policy hub is optimal for government relations teams managing complex policy issues across teams. It allows PCMA to prioritize developing issues, assess their impact, and take action accordingly — all while keeping teams on the same page. Read their story.